Review Process and Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers play a crucial role in evaluating technical papers submitted to conferences. The blind peer review process will be followed to access the quality of full. The criteria they use to assess the quality and suitability of papers can vary, but generally, they aim to ensure the significance, originality, and technical soundness of the work.
The Evaluation is based on scale parameters with option to write a detailed comments focusing on following points:
- Relevance to Conference Theme/Scope and Title of the Paper
- Abstract of the paper
- Comments on Novelty of the paper
- Elaborative Comments on the Result and contributions part
- Comments on Clarity and Organization of paper
- Comments on References and Related Work
- Comments on Ethical Considerations
- Comments on Significance and Impact
- Comments on Presentation Quality
- Overall Comments on the paper
- Any other Comment/Instructions
Plagiarism Policy: All papers should contain less than 10% similarity index